The Clinical Value of Radioembolization in the Treatment of Inoperable Liver Cancer
The Clinical Value of Radioembolization in the Treatment of Inoperable Liver Cancer
Published: July 2009
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy worldwide. HCC-related mortality is high because most cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage. HCCs are relatively resistant to radiation and the liver is unable to tolerate the radiation doses required to achieve tumoricidal effects by standard external-beam radiation. Focal radiation techniques employing a 3D approach have been shown to safely permit higher levels of radiation to targeted regions within the liver. Delivery of therapy through hepatic artery branches preferentially affects HCC tumors and spares the surrounding liver parenchyma. Selective targeting of radionuclides to tumors has been shown to achieve high radiation dose ratios. Transarterial radionuclide therapies have been developed with the objective of achieving selective intra-arterial delivery of radiotherapy, including radioactive iodine-131 (131I), rhenium-188 (188Re), yttrium-90 (90Y) (resin or glass microspheres), and others. These treatments have been used to treat HCC via a selective transarterial approach as an alternative to TACE. Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a relative contraindication to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE); in contrast, high specific activity radiomicrospheres do not occlude a significant portion of the hepatic arterial vascular bed and can therefore be used in patients with PVT. The devices, toxicities, and results with use of the available radioembolic devices are reviewed in this article.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common malignancy and the third most common cause of death from cancer worldwide.1 The incidence of HCC in the US is increasing because of the rise in the prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection.2,3 HCC-related mortality is high because most cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage, when potentially curative therapies such as liver transplantation, surgical resection, and local ablation are not feasible.4–7 The majority of patients are therefore candidates for palliative therapies only.8 Due to the capacity of liver cells to detoxify and excrete drugs, HCCs are relatively resistant to chemotherapy; in addition, the splenomegaly and cytopenias associated with cirrhosis with portal hypertension render patients prone to systemic chemotherapy-related toxicity.9 Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a loco-regional therapy that delivers high doses of chemotherapy to HCCs through the hepatic artery, with limited systemic effect. TACE has been proven to improve survival of patients with unresectable HCC without portal vein thrombosis (PVT).10–12 Recently, a number of devices for transarterial radioembolization (TARE) have been tested for treatment of HCC in early-phase studies. This article will summarize the results thus far, with an emphasis on yttrium-90 (90Y) radioactive glass microspheres, which are the only modality currently approved for use in the US.
Theoretical Considerations
The liver parenchyma is relatively sensitive to radiation, with a tolerance to external irradiation of approximately 30Gy.13,14 In contrast, HCCs are relatively resistant to radiation, requiring doses of 120Gy for tumoricidal effect. The liver is unable to tolerate the radiation doses required to achieve tumoricidal effects by standard external-beam radiation; therefore, whole-liver external-beam radiation therapy is of limited utility in the treatment of unresectable HCC.15 Several studies have confirmed that focal radiation techniques employing a 3D approach instead of broad axial-plane techniques safely permit higher levels of radiation to targeted regions within the liver.5,16 HCC tumors are highly vascular and receive almost all of their blood supply (95–100%) from the hepatic artery, in contrast to the normal liver parenchyma, which is primarily supplied by the portal vein (75–85%).15 Consequently, delivery of therapy through hepatic artery branches preferentially affects HCC tumors and spares the surrounding liver parenchyma. Selective targeting of radionuclides to tumors has been shown to achieve radiation dose ratios (tumor to benign liver) of up to 25–30 to 1.17
To Register to view full article click here
Inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma, portal vein thrombosis, radioembolization, radioactive iodine-131, rhenium-188, Theraspheres®, transarterial radionuclide therapies, yttrium-90
- Parkin DM, et al., CA Cancer J Clin, 2005;55:74–108.
- Stuart KE, et al., Cancer, 1996;77:2217–22.
- El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL, Gastroenterology, 2007;132:2557–76.
- Goin JE, et al., J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2005;16:195–203.
- Kulik LM, et al., J Surg Oncol, 2006;94:572–86.
- Geschwind JF, et al., Gastroenterology, 2004;127:S194–205.
- Salem R, Hunter RD, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006;66:S83–8.
- Okuda K, et al., Cancer, 1985;56:918–28.
- Alberts SR, et al., Mayo Clin Proc, 2007;82:628–37.
- Llovet JM, et al., Lancet, 2002;359:1734–9.
- Lo CM, et al., Hepatology, 2002;35:1164–71.
- Llovet JM, Bruix J, Hepatology, 2003;37:429–42.
- Cheng JC, et al., Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004;60:1502–9.
- Dawson LA, Ten Haken RK, Semin Radiat Oncol, 2005;15:279–83.
- Goin JE, et al., J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2005;16:205–13.
- Tse RV, et al., Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2008;67:113–23.
- Lui WY, et al., Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei), 1990;46:125–33.
- Ibrahim SM, et al., World J Gastroenterol, 2008;14:1664–9.
- Kanhere HA, et al., ANZ J Surg, 2008;78:371–6.
- Kumar A, et al., Radiology, 2007;243:509–19.
- Andrews JC, et al., J Nucl Med, 1994;35–1637–44.
- Brans B, et al., Eur J Cancer, 2006;42:994–1003.
- Kobayashi H, et al., Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi, 1984;44:96–8.
- Becker S, et al., Nucl Med Commun, 2008;29:815–25.
- Lau WY, Lai EC, et al., ANZ J Surg, 2008;78:331–2.
- Park C, et al., Liver, 1990;10:72–8.
- Lau WY, et al., Lancet, 1999;353:797–801.
- Lau WY, et al., Ann Surg, 2008;247:43–8.
- Raoul JL, et al., Br J Surg, 2003;90:1379–83.
- Raoul JL, et al., J Nucl Med, 1994;35:1782–7.
- Ho S, et al., Cancer, 1998;83:1894–1907.
- Order SE, et al., J Clin Oncol, 1985;3:1573–82.
- Zhang Z, et al., Cancer Biol Ther, 2006;5:318–22.
- Chen ZN, et al., Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006;65:435–44.
- Xu J, et al., Hepatology, 2007;45:269–76.
- Raoul JL, et al., Hepatology, 1997;26:1156–61.
- Rai R, Rai S, Br J Surg, 2004;91:373, author reply 373.
- Kumar A, et al., J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2006;17:157–61.
- Kumar A, et al., Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2006;18:219–23.
- Bal CS, Kumar A, Trop Gastroenterol, 2008;29:62–70.
- Liepe K, et al., Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2007;37:942–50.
- Knapp FF Jr, et al., Anticancer Res, 1997;17:1783–95.
- Wunderlich G, et al., Appl Radiat Isot, 2000;52:63–8.
- Wunderlich G, et al., Appl Radiat Isot, 2005;62:915–18.
- Paeng JC, et al., J Nucl Med, 2003;44:2033–8.
- Sundram F, et al., Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2004;31:250–57.
- Lambert B, et al., J Nucl Med, 2005;46:1326–32.
- Lambert B, et al., Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2006;33:344–52.
- Bernal P, et al., Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007;69:1448–55.
- Bernal P, et al., Semin Nucl Med, 2008;38:S40–45.
- Salem R, et al., J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2005;16:1627–39.
- Lewandowski RJ, et al., J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2005;16:1641–51.
- Kulik LM, et al., Hepatology, 2008;47:71–81.
- Carr BI, Liver Transpl, 2004;10:S107–10.
- Moreno-Luna LE, et al., Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2008; in press.
- Veerasamy M, et al., Gastroenterology, 2008;135:18–328.
- Lau WY, et al., Hepatogastroenterology, 2001;48:338–40.
- Steel J, et al., Psychooncology, 2004;13:73–9.
- Okuda K, et al., Oncol Rep, 1999;6:587–91.
- 18 August 2010
- 12 September 2010
- 15 September 2010






