There is a critical need for more effective therapies in multiple myeloma (MM) since all patients eventually relapse following front-line treatment. A variety of both genetic and epigenetic abnormalities may be present in MM, the latter including DNA and histone methylation and histone deacetylation, and are thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease. For example, global methylation analysis in MM has identified inactivated tumour suppressor genes that are prognostically important. Through their ability to acetylate histones and cytoplasmic proteins, histone deacetylases (HDAC) influence a wide variety of cellular functions, such as proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. Increased class 1 HDAC expression has been linked in solid tumours with more locally advanced, de-differentiated and proliferative tumours, and with poor prognosis in MM. HDAC inhibitors, panobinostat and ricolinostat, have been demonstrated to be effective in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed patients with MM and in heavily pre-treated patients with advanced MM. HDAC inhibitor–monoclonal antibody combinations are also being explored. The potential of HDAC inhibitors to improve outcome for patients with MM is evident but a greater understanding of their anti-tumour effects is needed.
Multiple myeloma (MM), epigenetics, DNA methylation, histone modifications, histone deacetylases inhibitors, panobinostat, ricolinostat, combination strategies
Andrew Spencer and Sridurga Mithraprabhu have nothing to disclose in relation to this article. This study involves a review of the literature and did not involve any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Authorship: All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval to the version to be published.
Medical writing assistance was provided by Catherine Amey at Touch Medical Media, UK, supported by Novartis.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, adaptation and reproduction provided the original author(s) and source are given appropriate credit.
August 03, 2016 Accepted:
September 20, 2016
Andrew Spencer, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia. E: email@example.com
The publication of this article was supported by Novartis. The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Novartis. The authors provided Novartis with the opportunity to review the article for scientific accuracy before submission. Any resulting changes were made at the author’s discretion.
Epigenetics encompasses heritable changes in the pattern of gene expression mediated by mechanisms other than alterations in primary nucleotide sequence. The epigenome is an inheritable record of changes to the DNA and histone proteins, such as methylation and nucleosome remodelling that directs which genes are to be silenced or expressed. Following early studies of abnormal gene expression in cancer, epigenetic modifications have been recognised to be of central importance in cancer pathophysiology.1 Mutations in regulators of the epigenome have been identified in cancer that have roles such as ‘writers’, ‘readers’, ‘erasers’ or ‘editors’ and have the potential to deregulate the expression of hundreds of genes genome-wide.2
Multiple myeloma (MM), a clonal expansion of plasma cells, is characterised by monoclonal protein production, end-organ damage and marked clinical and genetic heterogeneity.3–5 MM is the second most common haematological malignancy6 and accounts for approximately 20% of deaths from haematological malignancies7 and 0.8% of deaths from all cancers;8,9 in addition, MM is associated with high costs in healthcare provision.10 The median age of MM diagnosis is 74 years.11 In Europe, between 2005 and 2009, there was an over two-fold difference between the highest male cancer mortality in Hungary (235.2/100 000) and the lowest mortality in Sweden (112.9/100 000), and a 1.7-fold one in women (from 124.4 in Denmark to 71.0/100 000 in Spain).12Over the past decade, however, survival of patients with MM has improved dramatically with the advent of newer therapies.13
MM always follows the premalignant state of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), although the precise molecular mechanisms involved in the progression from MGUS to MM are not properly understood. Various distinct genetic abnormalities have been reported in both MM and MGUS including epigenetic alterations such as DNA and histone methylation, and are known to contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease.14–17 Front-line treatment of MM can result in high response rates,18–21 although all patients eventually relapse and more effective therapies are needed. MM is heterogeneous and is associated with complex gene abnormalities and multiple signalling aberrations. A strategy of targeting single signalling pathways, genes or individual gene products may not therefore be inadequate to supress MM cell growth.22 The aim of this review is to describe epigenetic modifications and therapeutic combination strategies in MM.
DNA methylation, which is the best characterised epigenetic modification, occurs in cytosinecontaining nucleotides that are immediately followed by nucleotide sequences containing guanine (i.e., cytosine-phosphodiester bond-guanine [CpG] islands). Located in 60% of promoters, CpG islands, when methylated usually results in silencing of tumour suppressor genes.23 These events are more frequent than tumour suppressor gene mutations. The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), was first identified in colorectal cancer24 and has been observed extensively in a wide variety of tumours,25 although CIMP has rarely been reported in MM.26 MM is however characterised by a level of heterogeneity in DNA methylation that exceeds that described in several solid cancers.27,28
The DNA methylome, which is the map of DNA methylation modifications, has been described in normal plasma cells (NPCs) and plasma cells from MGUS and MM patient samples (Figure 1).29 Aberrant methylation patterns are related to disease stage in MM with significant difference and heterogeneity in the global methylation patterns in the malignant cell types (MM, primary plasma cell leukaemia and in human myeloma cell lines) compared to the non-malignant cells (non-plasma cell disorders and MGUS).17 DNA methylation at transcription start sites and gene promoters has been associated with the formation of heterochromatin and long-term gene silencing.30,31 Methylation is also an inactivating mechanism of the tumour suppressor p16 gene in MM, which is associated with high plasma cell proliferation and short survival.32 Furthermore, p16 methylation may be a marker for overall epigenetic changes associated with disease progression.33 Global methylation analysis in MM has pinpointed inactivated tumour suppressor genes that are prognostically important.28 In an analysis of the association of differential DNA methylation with prognosis in 159 patients with myeloma, 195 genes with changes in DNA methylation were identified. Hypermethylation of the genes GPX3, RBP1, SPARC and TGFBI was associated with significantly shorter overall survival (OS); this association was independent of age, International Staging System score, and adverse cytogenetics.28
The most comprehensive methylation study to date has demonstrated that B-cell specific intronic enhancers undergo DNA hyper-methylation, resulting in enhanced decommissioning of genes related to B-cell differentiation consistent with MM acquiring or preserving a ‘stem cell-like’ methylome.30 Finally, the expression of DNA (cytosine-5-)- methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) is also known to be upregulated during disease pathogenesis compared to NPCs and silencing of DNMT1 significantly reduced the methylation of p16.34,35
MicroRNA are a class of short non-coding RNA molecules with RNA silencing functions.36 Epigenetic dysregulation of tumour-suppressor microRNA genes via DNA methylation has also been implicated in MM.37
1. Esteller M, Cancer epigenomics: DNA methylomes and histonemodification maps, Nat Rev Genet, 2007;8:286–98.
2. Plass C, Pfister SM, Lindroth AM, et al., Mutations in regulators of the epigenome and their connections to global chromatin patterns in cancer, Nat Rev Genet, 2013;14:765–80.
3. Palumbo A, Anderson K, Multiple myeloma, N Engl J Med, 2011;364:1046–60.
4. Morgan GJ, Walker BA, Davies FE. The genetic architecture of multiple myeloma. Nature reviews, Cancer, 2012;12(5):335–48.
5. Bergsagel PL, Mateos MV, Gutierrez NC, et al., Improving overall survival and overcoming adverse prognosis in the treatment of cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma, Blood, 2013;121:884–92.
6. Munshi NC, Anderson KC, New strategies in the treatment of multiple myeloma, Clin Cancer Res, 2013;19:3337–44.
7. Zweegman S, Palumbo A, Bringhen S, et al., Age and aging in blood disorders: multiple myeloma, Haematologica, 2014;99:1133–7.
8. Katzel JA, Hari P, Vesole DH, Multiple myeloma: charging toward a bright future, CA Cancer J Clin, 2007;57:301–18.
9. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al., Global cancer statistics, 2002, CA Cancer J Clin, 2005;55:74–108.
10. Cook R, Economic and clinical impact of multiple myeloma to managed care, J Manag Care Pharm, 2008;14(7 Suppl):19–25.
11. Turesson I, Velez R, Kristinsson SY, et al., Patterns of multiple myeloma during the past 5 decades: stable incidence rates for all age groups in the population but rapidly changing age distribution in the clinic, Mayo Clin Proc, 2010;85:225–30.
12. Bosetti C, Bertuccio P, Malvezzi M, et al., Cancer mortality in Europe, 2005–2009, and an overview of trends since 1980, Ann Oncol, 2013;24:2657–71.
13. Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, et al., Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies, Blood, 2008;111:2516–20.
14. Bergsagel PL, Kuehl WM, Molecular pathogenesis and a consequent classification of multiple myeloma, J Clin Oncol, 2005;23:6333–8.
15. Chng WJ, Santana-Davila R, Van Wier SA, et al., Prognostic factors for hyperdiploid-myeloma: effects of chromosome 13 deletions and IgH translocations, Leukemia, 2006;20:807–13.
16. Chapman MA, Lawrence MS, Keats JJ, et al., Initial genome sequencing and analysis of multiple myeloma, Nature, 2011;471(7339):467–72.
17. Walker BA, Wardell CP, Chiecchio L, et al., Aberrant global methylation patterns affect the molecular pathogenesis and prognosis of multiple myeloma, Blood, 2011;117:553–62.
18. Rajkumar SV, Blood E, Vesole D, et al., Phase III clinical trial of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a clinical trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, J Clin Oncol, 2006;24:431–6.
19. Rajkumar SV, Hayman S, Gertz MA, et al., Combination therapy with thalidomide plus dexamethasone for newly diagnosed myeloma, J Clin Oncol, 2002;20:4319–23.
20. Kumar S, Flinn I, Richardson PG, et al., Randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study (EVOLUTION) of combinations of bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, and lenalidomide in previously untreated multiple myeloma, Blood, 2012;119:4375–82.
21. Richardson PG, Weller E, Lonial S, et al., Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, Blood, 2010;116:679–86.
22. Mimura N, Hideshima T, Anderson KC, Novel therapeutic strategies for multiple myeloma, Exp Hematol, 2015;43:732–41.
23. Smith EM, Boyd K, Davies FE, The potential role of epigenetic therapy in multiple myeloma, Br J Haematol, 2010;148:702–13.
24. Toyota M, Ahuja N, Ohe-Toyota M, et al., CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer,Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1999;96:8681–6.
25. Issa JP, CpG island methylator phenotype in cancer, Nature Rev Cancer, 2004;4:988–93.
26. Martin P, Garcia-Cosio M, Santon A, et al., Aberrant gene promoter methylation in plasma cell dyscrasias, Experimental and molecular pathology, 2008;84:256–61.
27. Kim JH, Karnovsky A, Mahavisno V, et al., LRpath analysis reveals common pathways dysregulated via DNA methylation across cancer types, BMC Genomics, 2012;13:526.
28. Kaiser MF, Johnson DC, Wu P, et al., Global methylation analysis identifies prognostically important epigenetically inactivated tumor suppressor genes in multiple myeloma, Blood, 2013;122:219–26.
29. Agirre X, Castellano G, Pascual M, et al., Whole-epigenome analysis in multiple myeloma reveals DNA hypermethylation of B cell-specific enhancers, Genome Res, 2015;25:478–87.
30. Jones PA, Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond, Nat Rev Genet, 2012;13:484–92.
31. Raynal NJ, Si J, Taby RF, et al., DNA methylation does not stably lock gene expression but instead serves as a molecular mark for gene silencing memory, Cancer Res, 2012;72:1170–81.
32. Mateos MV, Garcia-Sanz R, Lopez-Perez R, et al., Methylation is an inactivating mechanism of the p16 gene in multiple myeloma associated with high plasma cell proliferation and short survival, Br J Haematol, 2002;118:1034–40.
33. Gonzalez-Paz N, Chng WJ, McClure RF, et al., Tumor suppressor p16 methylation in multiple myeloma: biological and clinical implications, Blood, 2007;109:1228–32.
34. Zhou W, Chen H, Hong X, et al., Knockdown of DNA methyltransferase-1 inhibits proliferation and derepresses tumor suppressor genes in myeloma cells, Oncol Lett, 2014;8:2130–34.
35. Zhan F, Hardin J, Kordsmeier B, et al., Global gene expression profiling of multiple myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and normal bone marrow plasma cells, Blood, 2002;99:1745–57.
36. Macfarlane LA, Murphy PR, MicroRNA: Biogenesis, Function and Role in Cancer, Curr Genomics, 2010;11:537–61.
37. Wong KY, Huang X, Chim CS, DNA methylation of microRNA genes in multiple myeloma, Carcinogenesis, 2012;33:1629–38.
38. Cohen I, Poreba E, Kamieniarz K, et al., Histone modifiers in cancer: friends or foes?, Genes Cancer, 2011;2:631–47.
39. Lauring J, Abukhdeir AM, Konishi H, et al., The multiple myeloma associated MMSET gene contributes to cellular adhesion, clonogenic growth, and tumorigenicity, Blood, 2008;111:856–64.
40. Mirabella F, Wu P, Wardell CP, et al., MMSET is the key molecular target in t(4;14) myeloma, Blood Cancer J, 2013;3:e114.
41. Min DJ, Ezponda T, Kim MK, et al., MMSET stimulates myeloma cell growth through microRNA-mediated modulation of c-MYC, Leukemia, 2013;27:686–94.
42. Wu SP, Pfeiffer RM, Ahn I, et al., Impact of genes highly correlated with MMSET myeloma on survival of Non-MMSET myeloma patients, Clin Cancer Res, 2016;22:4039–44.
43. Martinez-Garcia E, Popovic R, Min DJ, et al., The MMSET histone methyl transferase switches global histone methylation and alters gene expression in t(4;14) multiple myeloma cells, Blood, 2011;117:211–20.
44. Brito JL, Walker B, Jenner M, et al., MMSET deregulation affects cell cycle progression and adhesion regulons in t(4;14) myeloma plasma cells, Haematologica, 2009;94:78–86.
45. Cea M, Cagnetta A, Gobbi M, et al., New insights into the treatment of multiple myeloma with histone deacetylase inhibitors, Curr Pharm Des, 2013;19:734–44.
46. Weichert W, HDAC expression and clinical prognosis in human malignancies, Cancer Lett, 2009;280:168–76.
47. Mithraprabhu S, Kalff A, Chow A, et al., Dysregulated Class I histone deacetylases are indicators of poor prognosis in multiple myeloma, Epigenetics, 2014;9:1511–20.
48. Kikuchi J, Wada T, Shimizu R, et al., Histone deacetylases are critical targets of bortezomib-induced cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma, Blood, 2010;116:406–17.
49. Esteve PO, Chin HG, Smallwood A, et al., Direct interaction between DNMT1 and G9a coordinates DNA and histone methylation during replication, Genes Dev, 2006;20:3089–103.
50. Khong T, Sharkey J, Spencer A, The effect of azacitidine on interleukin-6 signaling and nuclear factor-kappaB activation and its in vitro and in vivo activity against multiple myeloma, Haematologica, 2008;93:860–9.
51. Moreaux J, Bruyer A, Veyrune JL, et al., DNA methylation score is predictive of myeloma cell sensitivity to 5-azacitidine, Br J Haematol, 2014;164:613–6.
52. Kalff A, Reed K, Khong TT, et al., 3033 Roar: A Phase Ib Trial of Oral Azacitidine in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients Refractory to Prior Lenalidomide, Presented at: American Society of Hematology 57th Annual Meeting & Exposition. Orlando, FL, USA, 5–8 December 2015.
53. Xie Z, Bi C, Chooi JY, et al., MMSET regulates expression of IRF4 in t(4;14) myeloma and its silencing potentiates the effect of bortezomib, Leukemia, 2015;29:2347–54.
54. Mithraprabhu S, Khong T, Jones SS, et al., Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors as single agents induce multiple myeloma cell death principally through the inhibition of class I HDAC, Br J Haematol, 2013;162:559–62.
55. Tandon N, Ramakrishnan V, Kumar SK, Clinical use and applications of histone deacetylase inhibitors in multiple myeloma, Clin Pharmacol, 2016;8:35–44.
56. Kalff A, Khong T, Mithrapabhu S, et al., A 2-Stage Phase II study of panobinostat consolidation in myeloma patients with < CR following high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 2015;15(Supplement 3):e132.
57. Kopito RR, Aggresomes, inclusion bodies and protein aggregation, Trends Cell Biol,2000;10:524–30.
58. Bennett EJ, Bence NF, Jayakumar R, et al., Global impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by nuclear or cytoplasmic protein aggregates precedes inclusion body formation, Mol Cell, 2005;17:351–65.
59. Kawaguchi Y, Kovacs JJ, McLaurin A, et al., The deacetylase HDAC6 regulates aggresome formation and cell viability in response to misfolded protein stress, Cell, 2003;115:727–38.
60. Hideshima T, Bradner JE, Wong J, et al., Small-molecule inhibition of proteasome and aggresome function induces synergistic antitumor activity in multiple myeloma, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2005;102:8567–72.
61. Santo L, Hideshima T, Kung AL, et al., Preclinical activity, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic properties of a selective HDAC6 inhibitor, ACY-1215, in combination with bortezomib in multiple myeloma, Blood, 2012;119:2579–89.
62. Vogl DT, Raje N, Hari P, et al., Phase 1b results of ricolinostat (ACY-1215) combination therapy with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) [abstract 4764], Blood, 2014;124:4764.
63. Dimopoulos M, Siegel DS, Lonial S, et al., Vorinostat or placebo in combination with bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma (VANTAGE 088): a multicentre, randomised, doubleblind study, Lancet Oncol, 2013;14:1129–40.
64. Siegel DS, Dimopoulos M, Jagannath S, et al., VANTAGE 095: An International, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Vorinostat (MK-0683) in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma, Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 2016;16:329–34.
65. Richardson PG, Schlossman RL, Alsina M, et al., PANORAMA 2: panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and bortezomibrefractory myeloma, Blood, 2013;122:2331–7.
66. San-Miguel JF, Hungria VT, Yoon SS, et al., Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind phase 3 trial, Lancet Oncol, 2014;15:1195–206.
67. San-Miguel JF, Hungria VT, Yoon SS, et al., Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who received prior bortezomib and IMiDs: A predefined subgroup analysis of PANORAMA 1, J Clin Oncol, 2015;33(suppl; abstr 8526).
68. Chari A, Cho HJ, Parekh SS, et al., A phase II study of panobinostat with lenalidomide and weekly dexamethasone in myeloma, J Clin Oncol, 2015;33(suppl; abstr 8528).
69. Yee AJ, Voorhees PM, Bensinger W, et al., Ricolinostat (ACY- 1215), a Selective HDAC6 Inhibitor, in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone: Results of a Phase 1b Trial in Relapsed and Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma, Presented at: 56th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–9 December 2014.
70. Popat R, Brown S, Flanagan LM, et al., Thalidomide, Dexamethasone and Panobinostat (VTD-P) for Patients with Relapsed and Relapsed/ Refractory Myeloma: Preliminary Results of the Muk-Six Phase I/IIa Trial, Presented at: 56th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition. San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–9 December 2014.
71. Shah JJ, Feng L, Manasanch EE, et al., Phase I/Ib Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy with Lenalidomide/ Bortezomib/Dexamethasone (RVD) and Panobinostat in Transplant-Eligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. Presented at: 56th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition. San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–9 December 2014.
72. Mishima Y, Santo L, Eda H, et al., Ricolinostat (ACY-1215) induced inhibition of aggresome formation accelerates carfilzomib-induced multiple myeloma cell death,Br J Haematol, 2015;169:423–34.
73. Berdeja JG, Hart LL, Mace JR, et al., Phase I/II study of the combination of panobinostat and carfilzomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, Haematologica, 2015;100:670–6.
74. Shah JJ, Thomas SK, Weber DM, et al., Phase 1/1b Study of the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Panobinostat + Carfilzomib in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma, Presented at: 54th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition. Atlanta, GA, USA, 8–11 December 2012.
75. Kaufman JL, Zimmerman T, Rosenbaum CA, et al., Phase I Study of the Combination of Carfilzomib and Panobinostat for Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Myeloma: A Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium (MMRC) Clinical Trial, Presented at: 56th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition. San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–9 December 2014.
76. Quayle SN, Jones SS, ACY-1215, a First-In-Class Selective Inhibitor Of HDAC6, Demonstrates Significant Synergy With Immunomodulatory Drugs (IMiDs) In Preclinical Models Of Multiple Myeloma (MM), Presented at: 55th Annual Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition. New Orleans, LA, USA, 7–10 December 2013.
77. Wu X, Tao Y, Hou J, et al., Valproic acid upregulates NKG2D ligand expression through an ERK-dependent mechanism and potentially enhances NK cell-mediated lysis of myeloma. Neoplasia, 2012;14:1178–89.
78. Huang B, Sikorski R, Sampath P, et al., Modulation of NKG2Dligand cell surface expression enhances immune cell therapy of cancer, J Immunother, 2011;34:289–96.
79. Kuster K, Grotzinger C, Koschel A, et al., Sodium butyrate increases expression of the coxsackie and adenovirus receptor in colon cancer cells, Cancer Invest, 2010;28:268–74.
80. Canes D, Chiang GJ, Billmeyer BR, et al., Histone deacetylase inhibitors upregulate plakoglobin expression in bladder carcinoma cells and display antineoplastic activity in vitro and in vivo, Int J Cancer, 2005;113:841–8.
81. Asvadi P, Cuddihy A, Dunn RD, et al., MDX-1097 induces antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity against kappa multiple myeloma cells and its activity is augmented by lenalidomide, Br J Haematol, 2015;169:333–43.
82. Kim K, Skora AD, Li Z, et al., Eradication of metastatic mouse cancers resistant to immune checkpoint blockade by suppression of myeloid-derived cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014;111:11774–9.
83. Naymagon L, Abdul-Hay M, Novel agents in the treatment of multiple myeloma: a review about the future, J Hematol Oncol, 2016;9:52.
84. Nooka AK, Lonial S, Novel Combination Treatments in Multiple Myeloma, Oncology, 2016;30:451–65.
85. Ray A, Sharma D, Song Y, et al., Combination of Anti-PD-L1 Antibody with IMiD® Immunomodulatory Drugs, HDAC Inhibitor ACY-1215, Bortezomib, or Toll-like Receptor 9 Agonist Enhances Anti-Tumor Immunity and Cytotoxicity in Multiple Myeloma, Presented at: 57th American Society of Hematology (ASH) ANnual Meeting. Orlando, FL, USA, 5–8 December 2015.